FE
FORUM ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (FET)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2025 came in within company guidance but missed Street on all three: revenue $193.3M vs $196.5M consensus*, adjusted EPS $0.04 vs $0.15*, and adjusted EBITDA $20.1M vs $23.0M*; GAAP EPS improved to $0.09 from $(0.85) YoY on lower interest and no impairments .
- Management maintained FY 2025 free cash flow guidance at $40–$60M and set Q2 2025 adjusted EBITDA guidance at $18–$22M, with Q2 revenue expected at $180–$200M .
- Subsea strength offset tariff-driven headwinds: subsea bookings up nearly 60% QoQ; valve product demand hit by buyer strike amid tariff uncertainty; $10M annualized cost cuts underway .
- Capital return/leverage remain central: seventh consecutive positive FCF ($7.2M before acquisitions), net debt $146M, liquidity $108M, and intra-quarter windows for buybacks subject to 1.5x leverage test .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Subsea bookings accelerated ~60% QoQ on new product adoption (including Unity remote ROV ops), adding backlog support: “we sold about 8 more of those systems since the beginning of the year” .
- Drilling & Completions delivered revenue growth and margin mix improvement; segment adjusted EBITDA rose to $12.4M (+31% QoQ) with orders +28% to $132.1M .
- Sustained cash generation: seventh consecutive quarter of positive FCF; company reiterated FY FCF $40–$60M and intends to allocate ~50% to net debt reduction and buybacks .
What Went Wrong
- Tariff shock triggered a buyer strike in Valve Solutions, materially dampening orders/deliveries; management expects weakness “for a couple of quarters” until tariff levels wane or inventories deplete .
- Artificial Lift & Downhole revenue fell 13% QoQ on timing of international project shipments and reduced valve demand; segment adjusted EBITDA down 30% .
- Street misses across revenue, adjusted EPS, and adjusted EBITDA, reflecting tariff uncertainty and unfavorable mix in Variperm/Canada and valves .
Financial Results
Note: Values marked with * retrieved from S&P Global.
Segment breakdown:
KPIs:
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We initiated actions to eliminate $10 million of annualized costs…we are tightly managing inventory levels to maximize cash flow and execute our backlog.” – Neal Lux, CEO .
- “Therefore, we expect flat quarter-over-quarter results with second quarter revenue to be in the range of $180 million to $200 million and EBITDA to be between $18 million and $22 million.” – CFO remarks .
- “Today, our forward free cash flow yield is north of 25%. Very few stocks trade at yields this high while also having FET's long-term growth potential…we will seek to buy as many shares as possible within our returns framework.” – Neal Lux .
- “The magnitude of tariffs levied on Chinese imports has impacted demand for our valves…our customers began a buyer strike, significantly reducing orders and delaying near-term deliveries.” – CFO remarks .
- “Approximately 80% to 85% of our cost base is variable…we initiated actions to eliminate $10 million of annualized cost.” – Neal Lux .
Q&A Highlights
- Subsea strength: Bookings up ~60% on ROVs and Unity operating system; ~8 Unity systems sold YTD; offshore demand across oil & gas, wind, and defense .
- Completion/stimulation consumables: Power-end replacement cycles shortening (12–18 months vs 3–4 years historically), supporting consumable demand even with flat crews .
- Valve buyer strike and tariffs: Customers delaying purchases amid tariff volatility; company pursuing alternate sourcing and assembly shifts (Saudi/Canada) to mitigate costs .
- Cost actions: $10M annualized fixed-cost reductions expected to benefit into Q2/Q3; high variable cost base enables quick flexing .
- Capital returns: Intra-quarter leverage test enables opportunistic buybacks; half of FCF targeted to net debt reduction; buybacks constrained by <1.5x net leverage requirement .
Estimates Context
- Q1 2025 vs Street: Revenue $193.3M vs $196.5M consensus*; adjusted EPS $0.04 vs $0.15*; adjusted EBITDA $20.1M vs $23.0M*, all misses .
- Q2 2025 set-up: Company guides revenue $180–$200M and adjusted EBITDA $18–$22M; Street Q2 consensus at time showed revenue $190.4M* and adjusted EPS $0.19*, implying modest tightening against guidance .
Note: Values marked with * retrieved from S&P Global.
Where estimates may need to adjust:
- Valve headwinds and buyer strike suggest near-term pressure on Artificial Lift & Downhole margins and volumes; consensus may need to reflect lower valve throughput for a “couple of quarters” .
- Subsea momentum and Unity adoption provide offset in Drilling & Completions; backlog execution could support Q2/Q3 revenue resilience .
- Cost actions ($10M annualized) and variable cost base may cushion EBITDA vs top-line softness in H2 if rig count lags commodity prices by 3–6 months .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Near-term setup: Expect Q2 revenue/EBITDA within company ranges ($180–$200M; $18–$22M) as subsea strength offsets tariff-driven valve softness; watch for delivery timing in Variperm (Canada) .
- Tariff resolution is a key catalyst: Clarity on tariff levels could unlock deferred valve demand; management is actively shifting sourcing/assembly (Saudi/Canada) to mitigate cost inflation .
- Cash discipline intact: Seventh straight positive FCF; FY 2025 FCF $40–$60M maintained; half targeted to net debt reduction with opportunistic buybacks subject to <1.5x leverage .
- Segment mix matters: Drilling & Completions margins improving on favorable mix; Artificial Lift & Downhole pressured by valves and project timing—monitor mix recovery in H2 .
- Subsea/Unity as growth vector: Strong bookings and software-driven remote operations provide structural support for revenue/margins through 2025 .
- Risk radar: Potential H2 activity decline if commodity prices remain low (rig count lag 3–6 months); management scenario points to ~$85M FY EBITDA if prices don’t rebound .
- Trading lens: Near-term volatility tied to tariffs and leverage test timing for buybacks; positive catalysts include subsea backlog conversion, cost-reduction flow-through, and any pickup in gas-directed activity (shorter consumable replacement cycles) .